skip to content

Under the CCPA as amended by the CPRA, a customer says her stored address is wrong — how must the business decide and act?

level: middleimportance: should knowfreq 38%

answer

  1. totality of the circumstances
  2. more likely than not
  3. documentation only to rebut
  4. correct downstream copies too
  5. keep it corrected

basics

~20 s

Under Civil Code 1798.106 and 11 CCR 7023, the business weighs the totality of the circumstances, may refuse on accuracy grounds only if the address is more likely than not accurate, and otherwise corrects it and instructs its service providers.

solid answer

~50 s

Civil Code `1798.106` gives consumers a right to have inaccurate personal information corrected, and requires **commercially reasonable efforts** to correct it as directed. The CCPA regulations (11 CCR 7023) set the test: the business considers the **totality of the circumstances**, meaning the nature of the information, how it was obtained, and any documentation, and may deny only if the information is **more likely than not accurate**. If the business is not the source and has no supporting documentation, her assertion may suffice. It may demand documentation only as needed to rebut its own. Having corrected the address, it instructs service providers and contractors to correct theirs, may defer backups until they are restored or used, and must make sure the correction sticks when data is next imported. It may delete instead of correcting only if deletion does not harm her or she consents.

go deeper

for a junior

Recall that CCPA consumers can ask a business to correct inaccurate personal information, and that the business must make commercially reasonable efforts to do it.

for a middle

Explain the 11 CCR 7023 test: totality of the circumstances, denial only if more likely than not accurate, and documentation required only to rebut the business's own.

for a senior

Show the operational side: propagate corrections to service providers, handle backups, stop upstream feeds overwriting the fix, and document every denial with reasons.

for a principal

Decide how source trust is modelled across systems so a consumer-verified value outranks bought-in data without freezing records that genuinely change.

## The right Under the CCPA as amended by the CPRA, Civil Code `1798.106(a)` gives a consumer the right to request that a business that maintains **inaccurate** personal information about them correct it, 'taking into account the nature of the personal information and the purposes of the processing'. On a verifiable request, `1798.106(c)` requires **commercially reasonable efforts** to correct it as directed, following `1798.130` and the regulations. The CCPA regulations fill that in at **11 CCR 7023**. ## How to decide: the totality of the circumstances Under 7023(b), the business considers the totality of the circumstances relating to the contested information, including: 1. **Its nature**: objective (a street address), subjective, unstructured or sensitive. 2. **How the business obtained it**: typed by the customer, bought in, inferred. 3. **Documentation** about its accuracy, from the consumer, the business or another source. The business **may deny** the request if the contested information is **more likely than not accurate** on that totality. If it is **not the source** of the information and has **no documentation** supporting it, the consumer's assertion of inaccuracy may be enough on its own (7023(b)(2)). For the stored address: if the old address came from a purchased mailing list and the customer says she moved, the business has no documentation of its own, and her statement can carry the request. ## Documentation rules - The business must **accept, review and consider** any documentation the consumer provides (7023(d)(1)). - It may **require** documentation only if needed to **rebut its own** documentation that the information is accurate, weighing the nature of the data, the quality of its own evidence, its purpose and the impact on the consumer (7023(d)(2)). - Documentation received may be used only to correct the information and for record-keeping, and must be kept securely (7023(d)(3)-(4)). ## How to act | Step | Source | |---|---| | Correct the information on existing systems | 7023(c) | | Instruct service providers and contractors holding it to correct theirs | 7023(c) | | Correct archived or backup copies when restored to an active system or next accessed or used | 7023(c) | | Tell the consumer whether the request was granted; explain any denial, with a detailed factual explanation for impossibility or disproportionate effort | 7023(f) | | On request, show her the specific pieces so she can confirm the fix; this does not count toward the twice-a-year limit on requests to know | 7023(j) | | Keep it corrected: an upstream feed must not silently overwrite the fix | 7023(k) | ## Alternatives and limits - **Deleting instead of correcting** is allowed only if deletion does **not negatively impact** the consumer, or she **consents**. The regulation's example: if deleting would make it harder to obtain a job, housing, credit or education, the business must correct or get consent (7023(e)). - **Repeat requests**: a business may deny a request to correct the **same alleged inaccuracy** it denied within the past **six months**, unless the consumer brings new or additional documentation (7023(g)). - **Fraud or abuse**: a good-faith, reasonable and documented belief that the request is fraudulent or abusive allows denial, with an explanation (7023(h)). - **Source disclosure**: where the business is not the source, it may tell the consumer where the alleged inaccuracy came from (7023(i)). - **Health data**: if it denies a correction of health information it collected and analysed, it must tell the consumer she may submit a written statement of up to **250 words** per alleged inaccuracy to be added to her record (7023(f)(3)). ## Why it is asked Correction is where data pipelines bite back. A fix made in the customer database but overwritten by the next import has not complied, and 7023(k) says so. Candidates should talk about propagating the change to service providers, flagging the corrected field as consumer-verified, and preventing a lower-trust source from overriding it.

  • A nightly import from an address-enrichment vendor keeps restoring the old address. Has the business complied?
    No. 11 CCR 7023(k) makes whether the business has measures to keep corrected information corrected part of whether it complied. Failing to address the possibility that later-received inaccurate data overrides the correction counts against it, so the import needs a rule that respects the consumer-verified value.
  • May the business simply delete the disputed address instead of correcting it?
    Only if deletion does not negatively impact the consumer or she consents, under 11 CCR 7023(e). If losing the address would, for example, make it harder for her to obtain housing, credit or a job, the business must correct it or get her consent to delete.

saying these in an interview costs you the question

  • Believes a business must accept every correction the consumer asserts
  • Demands documentation for every correction, whatever the circumstances
  • Corrects the main database but leaves service providers' copies stale
  • Deletes the disputed address instead of correcting it without checking the impact
  • Ignores that a scheduled import can overwrite the corrected value