skip to content

Under ePrivacy Art. 5(3) and GDPR consent rules, what must a news publisher's cookie banner do before setting non-essential cookies?

level: seniorimportance: must knowfreq 55%

answer

  1. storing or reading on the device
  2. GDPR-standard consent applies
  3. strictly necessary exemption
  4. cookie walls and scrolling

basics

~20 s

Under ePrivacy Directive Art. 5(3), storing or reading information on a user's device needs prior consent, to the GDPR standard, unless strictly necessary for the requested service. The banner must obtain an active, informed, granular choice before non-essential cookies are set.

solid answer

~50 s

`Art. 5(3)` of the ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC as amended in 2009) allows **storing information, or gaining access to information already stored**, in a user's terminal equipment **only with consent**, after clear and comprehensive information about the purposes. It covers any information, not only personal data. Two exemptions apply: storage or access **solely to transmit** a communication, or **strictly necessary** for a service the user explicitly requested. The consent standard is the GDPR's: the Directive's consent refers to the old data protection directive, and `Art. 94(2)` GDPR redirects that reference to the Regulation. So the banner must obtain **freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous** consent **before** setting analytics or advertising cookies: no pre-ticked boxes (Planet49, case C-673/17), no consent by scrolling, separate choices per purpose, refusal without detriment, and withdrawal as easy as acceptance (`Art. 7(3)`). EDPB Guidelines 05/2020 say access to content must not be made conditional on accepting cookies (a **cookie wall**).

go deeper

for a junior

Recall that non-essential cookies need prior consent under ePrivacy Art. 5(3), and that pre-ticked boxes and scrolling are not consent.

for a middle

Explain the two exemptions, why the GDPR standard of consent applies via Art. 94(2), and sort a site's cookies into exempt and consent-requiring.

for a senior

Evaluate a banner end to end: prior blocking, granular choices, refusal without detriment, withdrawal parity, records, and why a cookie wall fails.

for a principal

Weigh the revenue impact of honest refusal against the legal exposure of dark patterns and cookie walls, and set a single banner standard across properties.

## Two instruments, one consent standard A cookie banner sits where two EU instruments meet: - The **ePrivacy Directive**, Directive 2002/58/EC as amended by Directive 2009/136/EC, whose `Art. 5(3)` governs **storing and reading information on a user's device**. As a directive, it applies through each Member State's national implementing law. - The **GDPR**, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, which supplies the **standard of consent** and governs the **later processing** of any personal data collected. The link is textual. The ePrivacy Directive defines consent by reference to the data subject's consent in Directive 95/46/EC (`Art. 2(f)`), and `Art. 94(2)` GDPR says references to the repealed Directive are to be construed as references to the Regulation. EDPB Guidelines 05/2020 confirm that the GDPR conditions for valid consent apply in situations within the scope of the ePrivacy Directive. ## What Art. 5(3) requires `Art. 5(3)` requires Member States to ensure that *the storing of information, or the gaining of access to information already stored, in the terminal equipment of a subscriber or user is only allowed on condition that* the user *has given his or her consent, having been provided with clear and comprehensive information*, in particular about the purposes. Three features matter: - **Any information.** The rule speaks of *information*, not personal data. A cookie, a local-storage key or a device-fingerprinting read is caught whether or not the data identify anyone. - **Prior consent.** Consent must come before the storage or access, so non-essential cookies cannot be set on page load and "consented" afterwards. - **Two exemptions.** No consent is needed for technical storage or access *for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication*, or *as strictly necessary* for an information society service *explicitly requested* by the user. ## Sorting a publisher's cookies | Cookie purpose | Consent under Art. 5(3)? | |---|---| | Load balancing to deliver the requested page | No: strictly necessary for transmission or the requested service | | Remembering the reader's cookie choice itself | Generally treated as strictly necessary to honour that choice | | Session cookie for a logged-in subscriber | No, for the subscription service the reader requested | | Audience analytics | Yes | | Advertising and cross-site tracking | Yes | | Social media embeds that read or write identifiers | Yes | ## What a valid banner looks like Because the consent is GDPR consent, the banner must meet `Art. 4(11)` and `Art. 7`: 1. **Nothing non-essential before the choice.** Analytics and advertising cookies wait for consent. 2. **An active choice.** No pre-ticked boxes: Recital 32 excludes them, and in **Planet49 (case C-673/17)** the CJEU held that a pre-ticked checkbox does not give valid consent to cookies. EDPB Example 16 says **scrolling or swiping** never counts as a clear affirmative action. 3. **Informed.** Who sets the cookies, for what purposes, and that consent can be withdrawn. 4. **Specific and granular.** Separate choices for distinct purposes such as analytics and advertising (Recital 43; EDPB paras. 42-44). 5. **Refusable without detriment.** Recital 42 and EDPB para. 46 require that the person can refuse without detriment. A design where accepting takes one click and refusing takes several screens is hard to reconcile with freely given and unambiguous consent. 6. **Withdrawable as easily.** `Art. 7(3)`: a persistent control lets the reader change the choice as easily as they made it. 7. **Recorded.** `Art. 7(1)` requires the publisher to demonstrate consent. ## Cookie walls A **cookie wall** blocks content until the reader accepts cookies. EDPB Guidelines 05/2020 say that, for consent to be freely given, access to services and functionalities *must not be made conditional on the consent of a user to the storing of information, or gaining of access to information already stored* in the terminal equipment (para. 39). Example 6a describes a script blocking all content except an "Accept cookies" button and concludes the consent is not freely given (paras. 40-41). `Art. 7(4)` and Recital 43 support the same outcome. ## After the cookie is set `Art. 5(3)` governs the storage and access. What the publisher then does with personal data read from the device, such as building advertising profiles, is **processing under the GDPR**, with the GDPR's requirements for that processing. ## Common mistakes - Setting analytics cookies on first load and asking afterwards. - Treating "by continuing to browse you accept" as consent. - Assuming cookies holding no personal data are outside `Art. 5(3)`. - Burying "reject" behind a settings page while "accept" is one click. - Treating all first-party cookies as strictly necessary.

  • Under ePrivacy Art. 5(3), does a cookie that stores no personal data still need consent?
    Yes, unless an exemption applies. `Art. 5(3)` speaks of storing information, or gaining access to information already stored, in the user's terminal equipment, not of personal data. Whether the information identifies anyone decides whether the GDPR also applies to later processing, not whether `Art. 5(3)` applies to the storage.
  • Under ePrivacy Art. 5(3), which cookies can a publisher set without consent?
    Those used for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication, or strictly necessary for an information society service the user explicitly requested, such as load balancing to deliver the page or a logged-in session for a subscriber. Analytics, advertising and third-party tracking are not strictly necessary for reading the article.
  • Under EDPB Guidelines 05/2020, why does a cookie wall fail the GDPR consent standard?
    Paras. 39-41 say that for consent to be freely given, access to services must not be conditional on accepting storage of or access to information on the device. If the only way to read content is to click accept, the reader has no genuine choice, so consent is not freely given; `Art. 7(4)` and Recital 43 point the same way.

saying these in an interview costs you the question

  • Cookies that hold no personal data never need consent.
  • Continuing to scroll the article counts as accepting cookies.
  • A banner can set analytics cookies first and ask for consent afterwards.
  • Blocking the article until readers accept cookies gives freely given consent.
  • Every first-party cookie is strictly necessary and exempt from consent.